Crowdstrike Falcon vs. Avast: Endpoint Security Software

If you’re trying to choose endpoint protection software for your business, both of these options are good choices. Which one to choose ? Here is a comparison of the two.

Illustration: Lisa Hornung/TechRepublic

In an ideal world, there would be no need for security software. But also, in an ideal world, people could leave their doors unlocked 24/7 without worrying about dangerous intruders. Unfortunately, that’s not the world we live in, so we need to take security measures to protect our valuables. For digital assets, endpoint protection software solutions can ensure that every one of your digital processes is secure.

SEE: Password breach: Why pop culture and passwords don’t mix (free PDF) (TechRepublic)

Endpoint Protection Solutions

Businesses and organizations commonly use endpoint protection tools like Crowdstrike Falcon and Avast to secure their networks against potential threats. These platforms are deployed on users’ network terminals to monitor each of their devices. Cyberattacks can take place on vulnerable endpoints and, if undetected, can compromise the security of the organizational network. This reduces the risk of undetected security incidents and eliminates problems before they become serious.

Below is a comparison between Crowdstrike Falcon and Avast, their valuable features, and their methods of keeping their users’ network endpoints secure.

Crowdstrike Falcon vs. Avast: Which is Better for Locating and Identifying Security Threats?

Each of these products uses its technological capabilities to detect potential threats before they cause further damage to your organization.

Crowdstrike Falcon uses several methods to locate and identify potential security threats. For example, its malware sandbox module scans for and protects against advanced new threats. The threat intelligence built into the system can then be applied to provide users with information and context regarding their attacks. It also has Identity Threat Protection features to keep your team members safe on their devices. With this, it can detect lateral movements of authenticated devices to detect anomalies and threats to access privileges and identities for Azure AD, Microsoft Active Directory and cloud single sign-on solutions in your network. Finally, a threat detected by the automated system scan will cause a priority alert to be sent to the user for notification purposes.

Avast takes its endpoint security detection very seriously, as it analyzes the programs and files used by endpoints and ensures their security before allowing them to be used through endpoints. Avast’s detection methods, such as machine learning and advanced heuristics, help the software locate potential dangers, such as malware, adware, spyware, worms, Trojans and other malware. Additionally, its Wi-Fi inspector feature helps locate vulnerable areas of your network that might be at risk of attack. Once suspicious assets are collected, they are sent to the threat lab and analyzed.

Crowdstrike Falcon vs. Avast: Which Has Better Device Management Processes?

Endpoint protection platforms such as Crowdstrike Falcon and Avast can also provide security by monitoring endpoints connected to your network. This can help protect your data and assets, as everything can be detected and eradicated before going further into your network system.

Crowdstrike Falcon is a cloud-based solution that simplifies endpoint security processes for users with its centralized management and accessible dashboards. In addition to the previously mentioned endpoint authentication security, the tool performs real-time application inventory management to maintain endpoint security. The platform can be tuned and customized to allow for scalability, malware scanning, media protection, and proper media removal. The Crowdstrike Falcon API means that users can also connect to their various other security software products for better use of data.

With Avast, data is easily managed through the management console. With this online management platform, users can manage their devices, subscriptions, frequency of scheduled security scans, and deploy antivirus features as needed. It also has security features for specific endpoint components, including webcam protection and VPN encryption for online browsing. For digital assets that may pose a threat to endpoint security, Avast’s Data Shredder can ensure they are permanently deleted. But when security issues arise, hope is not always lost. Endpoint devices that have been compromised can be recovered, as Avast Rescue Disk has an external backup antivirus for these situations.

Crowdstrike Falcon vs. Avast: Which is Better for Addressing Endpoint Security Threats?

It’s important to think about how your endpoint protection solutions handle security threats once they’ve been identified.

Crowdstrike Falcon Spotlight uses endpoint detection information to assess network vulnerability, harden areas of weakness, and fix security gaps. Threat response occurs in real time and is displayed in the solution platform for users to address and eliminate potential threats. Its rapid deployment and configuration features begin within the first 24 hours of a possible engagement against a threat, with powerful prevention policies to quickly stop the execution and lateral movement of active attacks. Machine learning is also used to analyze virus behavior and block potential threats before they become bigger problems. Crowdstrike Falcon’s real-time response feature can resolve your endpoint security issues with precision to analyze attacks, manage processes, remove any memory-resident malware or malicious files, and run large-scale recovery scripts. Its analysis and reporting tools also enable users to gain actionable insights from the collected data. Finally, the system works to resolve threats to endpoint recovery, so users can get back to work without having to reimage or reissue devices.

Avast responds to endpoint security threats and suspicious activity by taking steps to deflect them before they affect the device. Its firewalls filter network traffic for suspicious aspects. Avast has shields to block dangerous programs and websites before they can be used for device apps, web actions, and emails. Online activities are encrypted with Avast VPN so users can browse the web anonymously and securely. Your team members will surely appreciate the system’s response to security threats, and there’s even an anti-spam feature to block unwanted spam. Finally, the technology handles all detected threats, turning users into a global network of cooperating sensors. When a device encounters malware, Avast uses six layers of protection to instantly identify, block and notify the rest of the network of the encounter.

Crowdstrike Falcon vs. Avast: Which is better?

So which of these devices came out on top? Well, the answer can change depending on who is asking.

Based on what we’ve learned about each of the solutions, it’s safe to say that Crowdstrike Falcon practices a more action-oriented approach when it comes to dealing with endpoint threats, as its tool constantly uses its technology and automation to defend against the next attack. However, Avast’s process can be seen as more defensive than offensive. Rather than spending energy on analyzing detected threats, this tool is full of defense methods against anything that might arise.

If you are interested in one of these devices, you need to consider which approach would be best for your network endpoint security needs.

Comments are closed.